PAGEVIEWERS

2009 ல் நியமனம் பெற்ற இடைநிலை ஆசிரியருக்கு மாவட்ட மாறுதல் வேண்டி முதன் முதலில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்தது நமது சங்கம் மட்டுமே ! 

அபிடவிட் நகல்



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
I.A. Nos.6-7   of 2012 in
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6186-6187 OF 2008
ARISING OUT OF
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 18227-18228 OF 2008

IN THE MATTER OF :
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.                                                                         .Appellants
Versus
Unemployed Sec. Grade. Tech. Welf. Assn. & Ors.                            ..Respondents

AND IN THE MATTER  OF:
 Assistant Teachers Association of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by its President, N. Karthikeyan                                           …..      Applicant.


WITH

I.A. NO.      OF 2012
AN APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT


AND

I.A.NO.     OF 2012
AN APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF  ORDER


PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX, PLEASE SEE INSIDE)
















ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT : SURESHAN P.


INDEX

Sl.No.                         Particulars                                                                             Pages

1.                                 I.A. Nos.      of 2012
Application for Impleadment with affidavit

2.                                 I.A. Nos.      of 2012
                                    Application for Modification of Interim  order
                                    Dated 20.10.2008 passed by this Hon’ble Court in
S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008 (Civil Appeal
Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 )

3.                                 ANNEXURE –A/1
A true copy of  order  dated 20.10.2008 passed by
this Hon’ble Court in  S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of
2008 (Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 )


4.                                 ANNEXURE-A/2
A true copy of the order dated 9.2.2011  passed by
this Hon’ble Court in  I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil
Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008                          



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
I.A. Nos.         of 2012 in
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6186-6187 OF 2008
ARISING OUT OF
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 18227-18228 OF 2008

IN THE MATTER OF :
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.                                                                         .Appellants
Versus
Unemployed Sec. Grade. Tech. Welf. Assn. & Ors.                            ..Respondents

AND IN THE MATTER  OF:
 Assistant Teachers Association of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by its President, N. Karthikeyan                                                       .. Applicant.


APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADING OF THE APPLICANT AS PARTY RESPONDENT

To

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES
OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

THE HUMBLE APPLICATION OF THE  APPLICANT ABOVE NAMED

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1.   That the present application  is  filed  seeking  impleadment of the applicant  association   as party respondent in the pending Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 arising out of special Leave petition  being  S.L.P.(C) Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008  arising out of the final judgment dated 14.05.2008 passed by the Madurai bench of the High Court of Madras in W.A. (MD) Nos. 119 and 122 of 2008.

2.   That the Applicant  Association namely Assistant Teachers Association of Tamilnadu is a  registered Association  bearing  registration No. 37 of 2010. It is submitted that most of the members of  the Applicant   Association are Secondary Grade Assistant Teachers, who were appointed in the year 2009,  that is subsequent to the interim order passed by this Hon’ble Court in the above  mentioned Civil Appeals.

3.   It is submitted that previously the Teachers in the Panchayat Union School were under the governance of the concerned Panchayat Union under Rural Development and Local Administration Department.  Subsequently the Government of Tamilnadu in and by G.O. Ms. No. 1279 Education dated 29.6.1981 have declared that all the teachers working  in the Panchayat Union Schools will become Government servant with effect from 1.6.1989 and they will be eligible to all the benefits available to the Government Servants.  Hence by virtue of the said Government order, the teachers who are working in the Panchayat Union schools have become Government servants and that they are all entitled to all the benefits and privileges available to the Government servants.

4.   It is submitted that  the Government of Tamilnadu by G.O. Ms. No. 447 dated 16.7.1996 and by the subsequent order in G.O. Ms. No. 241, School Education Department dated 22.9.2007 prescribe the District – wise recruitment of Secondary Grade teachers in the Government/Panchayat Union/Municipal Schools in the state. It is submitted that  by the  virtue of the above said order, the selection will  be made from among the candidates whose names had been registered in the Employment Exchange of the respective Districts.   It is submitted that the said method of appointment was challenged by a batch of writ petitions before the Hon’ble High Court in so far as it restricts the selection and appointment of Secondary Grade teachers by District-wise seniority in the Employment Exchanges, as ultra-vires and unconstitutional and also sought for further direction to the Respondents therein to make recruitment on State-wide  basis.   It is submitted that the learned single judge of the Hon’ble High Court dismissed the writ petitions by the judgment dated 4.2.2008. 

5.      It is submitted that aggrieved by the judgment dated 4.2.2008 , writ appeals were preferred and the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court (Madurai Bench), of Madras was pleased to allow the Writ Appeals by judgment dated 14.5.2008 by observing  that the instructions prescribing the recruitment on the basis of District-wise, are violative of Articles 14, 16 and 19 (1) of the Constitution of India.   The Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court held that
“35.  In view of the above discussion, in our considered opinion, confining the question of selection to the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange of a particular district without considering the willingness, availability and suitability of similar candidates who have been registered in the other district employment exchanges, is clearly violative of fundamental rights and therefore, cannot be countenanced.  The impugned G.O. Ms. No. 447, dated 16.07.1996 is liable to be quashed.  Accordingly, a direction is issued to consider the question of selection of eligible candidates, even though such candidates names have been registered in other District Employment Exchanges.  For the aforesaid purpose, obviously intimation is required to be given to all the District Employment Exchanges and public advertisement throughout the State is required to be made so that any willing candidate even though registered in a different district can offer his candidature.”


6.   It is submitted that the State of Tamil Nadu preferred  Special leave petitions being S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008 before this Hon’ble Court against the common judgment dated 14.5.2008 of the Hon’ble Division Bench (Madurai Bench), of Madras.  It is submitted that on 20.10.2008 , this Hon’ble  Court  was pleased to pass the following interim order in the said cases while granting  leave.;

              Leave granted.
 
In so far as the applications for impleadment, they shall be  brought up along with the main matters.
 
Having regard to the fact that a large number of vacancies in the   State have remained unfilled, the State Government sought leave to fill the posts. On the submissions made, we make the following interim order, accepting the State's proposal : "Appointment to the post of Secondary   Grade Teachers may be made by the State Government, by calling the list of eligible persons from all the District Employment Exchanges and by  newspaper Public Advertisements throughout the State so that any willing   candidate even though registered in different Districts can participate in  the selection. It shall be made clear in the Public Advertisement that the  selection would be based on the Employment Exchange seniority. It shall   also be made clear that any person selected and appointed in a particular School within a District cannot aspire for or seek transfer to another School outside the District."
 
This aforesaid arrangement will apply for any recruitment to be made pending disposal of these appeals.”

      A true copy of the order dated 20.10.2008  passed by this Hon’ble Court in  S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008 (Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 ) is produced herewith and marked as ANNEXURE A/1  at page No.


7.   It is respectfully submitted that  on 9.2.2011 , this Hon’ble Court was pleased to issue notice in I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 . A true copy of the order dated 9.2.2011  passed by this Hon’ble Court in  I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008  is produced herewith and marked as ANNEXURE A/2  at page No.

8.   It is  respectfully submitted that the  Applicant Association is aggrieved by the above said restriction on transfer imposed in interim order dated 20.10.2008  passed by this Hon’ble Court. It is respectfully submitted that since  most of the members of the Applicant Association are appointed subsequent  to the above mentioned interim order , they are directly affected by the restriction imposed by this Hon’ble Court . It is further submitted that the  Applicant Association  has concern and also interest in the present litigation and its member’s rights are directly in issue in the pending Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 . Hence the Applicant  Association is filing this impleading application  as well as an application for modification of the interim order dated 20.10.2008 passed by this Hon’ble Court.

9.   It is submitted that when the Secondary Grade Teachers were absorbed as Government servant, all the benefits entitled for Government service is made applicable to the Secondary Grade teachers appointed under State-wide recruitment.  Hence it is respectfully  submitted that there can not be any discrimination in the matter of transfer between other Government Servants and the Secondary Grade teachers who were appointed under State-wide  recruitment.

10. It is submitted that under Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India, there shall be a equality of the opportunity to all citizens in the matter of relation to employment or appointment to any office under the State and no citizen shall on grounds only on religion, caste, sex, decades, place of birth, residence of any of them be and ineligible or discriminated against in respect of any employment of office under the State.  Further  this Hon’ble  Court also held  in General Manson Southern Routuns Vs. Rangachari (AIR 1962- SC-36):

“The matter relating to employment or appointment are held by the Supreme Court to hear all maters in relation to employment both parties, subsequently such as the initial appointment, conditions of service, pertaining to the office to which be appointment is made example, salary, increment, promotion, leave, gratuity, pension and age of superannuation and etc…”

11.       It is the humble submission of the  applicant association that article 16 (2) is also applicable in the matter of transfer . It is further submitted that the Selection, appointment and transfer of the post in the  Government service  in the state of Tamil Nadu can not be restricted to District wise or on  the basis of  residential qualification and if such restriction is imposed ,the same is unconstitutional  and  unsustainable in law .

12.       It is further submitted that  the restriction imposed  in the present case is discriminatory in nature and the same is violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India as  there is no restriction for other Government teachers   who were already appointed as  Secondary Grade teachers in the Government/Panchayat Union/Municipal Schools and also other teachers who are appointed in the Government Schools.  

13.       It is submitted that due to the restrictions  that the appointed teachers in a particular School within a District can not aspire or seek transferto another School outside the District, the appointed teachers are not able to get  transfer as per the government service rule even if there are vacancies in other  Districts.  

14.       It is further submitted that  the persons who are appointed subsequently are able to get their appointment in their District because of vacancies,   whereas the teachers already appointed as per the direction of the supreme court  were not able to get transfer to their places though there are vacancies.  

15.       It is submitted that the restriction imposed in the interim order dated 20.10.2008   directing not to seek transfer, the teachers who were already appointed particularly widows, wife of ex-servicemen and husband-wife are badly affected and  they are  made to stay away from the family and living apart from their family .  

16.       It is respectfully submitted that further no other departments in Government of Tamilnadu have such conditional appointments except the appointments in issue in the present case . It is submitted that because of restriction imposed in interim order, those appointed under state-wide category are made to serve in the  restricted place without any transfer  to other district  indefinitely.  

17.       It is submitted that in view of the restriction imposed in the interim order, the teacher who were appointed under State-wide category,  mostly above 30 years of age,  particularly women teachers are made to stay away from their family but in some unsafe remote Village, without any transfer for indefinite period only because they are appointed by virtue of the interim order  with restriction.  

18.       It is respectfully submitted that the equality of opportunities to eligible person in the matter of appointment guaranteed under the Constitution of India is denied by the restriction imposed in the present case .  

19.       It is submitted that  the  classification in the present recruitment on the basis of region / residence  in the present case is illegal ,  irrational and arbitrary  and also discriminative  and the same runs counter to our Constitutional ethos on unity and integrity and equality of the nation.  

20.       It is respectfully submitted that under  Article 16  of  the Indian Constitution ,  all citizens in the matter of public service shall be treated  alike under the like circumstances and conditions.  The primary aim of the said article is  to prevent any person or class of persons being singled out  as special subject or suffer any discrimination or hostile treatment.  

21.       It is submitted that  by virtue of the above said restriction in the interim order passed by this Hon’ble Court most of the members of the applicant Association who are appointed after the said order under State-wide recruitment are  not able to get transfer though they have served in the District where they have appointed for 3 years in the said District.   

22.       Hence it is respectfully submitted that  it is just and necessary to implead the applicant  Association in the above mentioned civil appeals as respondent and the same would  enable  the applicant association  to put forth their submissions and grievances before this Hon’ble Court .  It is respectfully submitted that if the applicant  Association is not impleaded  as the respondent in the above mentioned appeals,  they will be put to much hardship and suffer irreparable loss and injury .



PRAYER
In the facts and circumstances above, the Applicant prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to :

(a)       implead the applicant  association   as a party in   the pending Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008; and /or

(b)       pass such other and further order as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and  proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE APPLICANT SHALL AS IN DUTY BOUND EVER PRAY

DRAWN BY                                                                                         FILED BY


MALAVIKA G                                                                                  (SURESHAN P. )
ADVOCATE                                                ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT


Dated :
New Delhi    





நமது வழக்கை விசாரணைக்கு ஏற்று நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய ஆணை 


 வழக்கு இறுதி விசாரணையில் நமது வழக்கறிஞர்  கலந்து கொண்டதுக்கான ஆதாரம் .

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Weekly Cause List

( For 27-08-2013 to 29-08-2013 )

     COURT NO. 11
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
                    ----------------------------------
PART-HEARD 

1. C.A.No.6888/2008 U.O.I. & ORS.                            MR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD
  XIV  PH             Vs.S.C.KARMAKAR & ORS.                 MR. DEBASIS MISRA                       
   116,123,  0  S.( 610)                                     MR. YASH PAL DHINGRA                    
 NOT TO BE LISTED BEFORE :  132,  0,  0                
 GROUP MATTERS
 -------------

2. C.A.No.6186-6187/2008 STATE OF T.NADU & ANR.              MR. M. YOGESH KANNA
  XII  SD             Vs.UNEMPLOYED SEC.GRADE TECH.          MR. SUMIT KUMAR                         
                         WELF.ASSN.&ORS                

116. S.( 615)         (With Appl.(s) for directions       MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN                    
                          and impleadment and                MS. N. SHOBA                            
                          impleadment and impleadment        MR. L.K. PANDEY                         
                          and impleadment and                MR. SURESHAN P.                         
                          impleadment and impleadment        MS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI                  
                          and with office report)            MR. VIJAY KUMAR                         
                                                        MR. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD                  
                                                        MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD               
                                                        MR. V.N. RAGHUPATHY                     
                                                        MR. ABHAY KUMAR                         
                                                        MR. RAKESH K. SHARMA                    
WITH
    C.A.No.6184-6185/2008 SECONDARY GRADE TRAIND.TECH.       MS. M. SARADA                           
  XII                    WELF.ASSN. Vs. UNEMP.SEC.           MR. SUMIT KUMAR                         
                         GRADE TECH.WELF.ASN.STY.& ORS.

116. S.( 615)         (With Office Report)                MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN                    
    C.A.No.6188-6189/2008 T.NADU SEC.GRADE TRAINED           MS. PROMILA                             
  XII                    TEACH.WEL.ASSO. Vs. UNEMP.SEC.      MR. SUMIT KUMAR                         
                         GRADE TEACHERS WEL.ASO.SO.&ORS

116. S.( 615)         (With Office Report)                MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN                    
    SLP(C)No.20606/2010 R. JAYA MANI                         MR. VIKAS MEHTA                         
  XII                 Vs.DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDN.         MR. M. YOGESH KANNA                     
                         COLL.RD&ORS.                  

116. S.( 615)         (With Prayer for Interim      
                          Relief and Office Report)    
    SLP(C)No.20755/2010 M.SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE KUMAR         MR. VIKAS MEHTA                         
  XII                 Vs.DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY              MR. M. YOGESH KANNA                     
                         EDUCATION & ORS.              

116. S.( 615)         (With Prayer for Interim      
                          Relief and Office Report)    
 SPECIALLY DIRECTED/ADJOURNED MATTERS
 ------------------------------------

3. C.A.No.331/2007 GANESHLAL                                 MR. S. RAJAPPA
  XVII ADJD           Vs.SHYAM                                                        

116. S.(3802)                                                 

4. C.A.No.1762/2007 J.H. PATEL (D) BY LRS. AND               MR. R.D. UPADHYAY
  XV   ADJD              ORS.                                MR. C.D. SINGH                          
                     Vs.NUBOARD MFG. CO LTD. & ORS.  

116. S.( 101)         (With Appl.(s) for permission       MR. V.N. RAGHUPATHY                     
                          to file additional documents 
                          and with office report) 
  [ WL.NO.25/2013
 
 
 
 

2009 இடை நிலை ஆசிசியர் மாறுதல் வழக்கு

2009 இடை நிலை ஆசிசியர்  மாறுதல்  வழக்கு   5-9-13   
 அன்று முடிவுக்கு  வந்தது  .   5-9-13   ல் வழங்கப்பட்ட இறுதி  தீர்ப்பு ம்  அதில் நமது வழக்கறிஞர்கள் கலந்து கொண்டதற்கு ஆதாரமாக பெயர்  இடம்   பெற்றுள்ள விபரமும் .சிலரின் போலி முகத்திரையை இனம் கண்டுக்கொள்ள மீண்டும் நாம் இதை வெளியிடுகிறோம் 


 

ITEM NO.102               COURT NO.11             SECTION XII
            S U P R E M E   C O U R T   O F   I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
                    CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
STATE OF T.NADU & ANR.                            Appellant (s)
                 VERSUS
UNEMPLOYED SEC.GRADE TECH.WELF.ASSN.&ORS          Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions,impleadment and office report)
WITH
Civil Appeal NO. 6184-6185 of 2008
(With office report)
Civil Appeal NO. 6188-6189 of 2008
(With office report)
 SLP(C) NO. 20606 of 2010
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20755 of 2010
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date: 05/09/2013  These Appeals/SLPs were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv.
                         Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.
                         Mr. A. Santha Kumaran,Adv.
                         Mr. S. Thananjayan,Adv.
                         Ms. M. Sarada,Adv.
                         Ms. Promila,Adv.
                         Ms. Indu Malhotra,Sr.Adv.
                         Mr. Vivek Jain,Adv.
                         Ms. Namrata Sood,Adv.
                         Ms. Nishtha Kumar,Adv.
                         Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
                         Mr. Sumit Kumar,Adv.
                         Mr. Danish Zuber,Adv.
                         Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.
                         Ms. Supriya,Adv.
                         Ms. Chandan Ramamurthi ,Adv
                                 - 2 -
                         Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan,Adv.
                         Mr. Anis Mohammad,Adv.
                         Mr. L.K. Pandey,Adv.
                         Mrs.Revathy Raghavan ,Adv.
                         Mr. G. Umapathy,Adv.
                         Mr. S.Ram Subramanian,Adv.
                         Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma ,Adv
                         Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv
                         Mr. V.N. Raghupathy ,Adv
                         Ms. V. Mohana,Adv.
                         Mr. B. Raghunath,Adv.
                         Mr. Vijay Kumar ,Adv
                         Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.
                         Ms. N. Shoba,Adv.
                         Mr. Sri Ram J. Thalapathy,Adv.
                         Mr. V. Adhimoolam,Adv.
                         Mr. A. Prasanna Venkat,Adv.
                         Mr. Abhay Kumar ,Adv
                         Mr. Jayanth Muth Raj,ADv.
                Mrs. Malavika J,Adv.
                Mr. Sureshan P.,Adv.(டாட்டா வழக்கறிஞர்கள் )   
                          Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.
           UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R
      CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
                 Civil Appeals are disposed  of,  in  terms  of  the  signed
      order.
      CIVIL APPEAL Nos.6184-6185/2008 & C.A.Nos.6188-6189/2008
        Civil Appeals are disposed of as having become infructuous,
      in view of the disposal of Civil Appeal Nos.6186-6187/2008.
      SLP(C)NOS.20606/2010 & 20755/2010
            List the SLPs on Tuesday, the 10th September, 2013.
          (O.P. Sharma)              (Sneh Lata Sharma)
          Court Master                        Court Master
                 (Signed order is placed on the file)
                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                    CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
STATE OF T.NADU & ANR.                            Appellant (s)
                 VERSUS
UNEMPLOYED SEC.GRADE TECH.WELF.ASSN.&ORS          Respondent(s)
                                    WITH
                     Civil Appeal NO. 6184-6185 of 2008
                                     AND
                     Civil Appeal NO. 6188-6189 of 2008
                                  O R D E R
      CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
                  Heard  Mr.  R.  Venkataramani,  learned   senior   counsel
      appearing in support of the appellants and Mr.  Sumit  Kumar,  learned
      counsel appearing for respondent No.1.  We record the statement of Mr.
      Venkataramani to the following effect namely:
           'That the teachers who were appointed prior to  the  G.O.  Dated 15.11.2011 will remain protected and as  far  as  the  transfers sought by the teachers outside their Districts are concerned, it is for  them  to  apply  to  the  authority  concerned  and  the authority  concerned  will  consider   their   applications   in accordance with their rules.'
            The  respondents  are  satisfied  with  the  statement  of   Mr.Venkataramani, learned senior counsel for the appellants.
                                  - 2 -
                 In view of the above, the Civil  Appeal  Nos.6186-6187/2008
      stand disposed of.
      I.A.Nos.14-15/2012 in C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
                 Ms. V. Mohana, learned counsel alongwith Mr.  Vijay  Kumar,
      Advocate appearing for  the  applicants  in  I.A.Nos.14-15/2012  seeks
      leave to  withdraw the same with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
                 I.A.Nos.14-15/2012 are accordingly dismissed  as  withdrawn
      with the aforesaid liberty.
      I.A.Nos.16-17/2012 in C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
                 Heard Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing  on
      behalf of the Applicant with Ms. N. Shobha, Advocate.
                 I.A.Nos.16-17/2012 stand disposed of, in terms of the order
      passed in C.A. No.6186-6187/2008, in view of the statement of  Mr.  R.
      Venkataramani, learned senior counsel for the appellants.
      I.A.Nos.6-7/2012 in C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
                 Heard Mr. G. Umapathy, learned counsel alongwith Mr. Rakesh
      Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant.
                 I.A.Nos.6-7/2012 stand disposed of, in terms of  the  order
      passed in C.A. No.6186-6187/2008, in view of the statement of  Mr.  R.
      Venkataramani,   learned   senior   counsel   for   the    appellants.
                                  - 3 -
                 In view of the  disposal  of  the  Civil  Appeal  Nos.6186-
      6187/2008, all pending IAs stand disposed of.
      CIVIL APPEAL Nos.6184-6185/2008 & C.A.Nos.6188-6189/2008
                  Mr.  S.  Thananjayan,  learned   counsel   appearing   for
      appellants in these appeals stated that in view  of  the  disposal  of
      Civil   Appeal   Nos.6186-6187/2008,   these   appeals   have   become
      infructuous.
                 Civil  Appeal  Nos.6184-6185/2008  &  6188-6189/2008  stand
      disposed of as having become infructuous.
                                          ......................J.
                                          [ H.L. GOKHALE 
      NEW DELHI                           ......................J.
      DATED; SEPTEMBR 5, 2013             [ J. CHELAMESWAR ]


 

No comments:

Post a Comment