2009 ல் நியமனம் பெற்ற இடைநிலை ஆசிரியருக்கு மாவட்ட மாறுதல் வேண்டி முதன் முதலில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்தது நமது சங்கம் மட்டுமே !
அபிடவிட் நகல்
நமது வழக்கை விசாரணைக்கு ஏற்று நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய ஆணை
வழக்கு இறுதி விசாரணையில் நமது வழக்கறிஞர் கலந்து கொண்டதுக்கான ஆதாரம் .
2009 இடை நிலை ஆசிசியர் மாறுதல் வழக்கு 5-9-13
அன்று முடிவுக்கு வந்தது . 5-9-13 ல் வழங்கப்பட்ட இறுதி தீர்ப்பு ம் அதில் நமது வழக்கறிஞர்கள் கலந்து கொண்டதற்கு ஆதாரமாக பெயர் இடம் பெற்றுள்ள விபரமும் .சிலரின் போலி முகத்திரையை இனம் கண்டுக்கொள்ள மீண்டும் நாம் இதை வெளியிடுகிறோம்
அபிடவிட் நகல்
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE
JURISDICTION
I.A. Nos.6-7 of 2012 in
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6186-6187
OF 2008
ARISING OUT OF
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION
(CIVIL) NOS. 18227-18228 OF 2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
State of Tamil
Nadu & Anr. .Appellants
Versus
Unemployed Sec. Grade. Tech. Welf.
Assn. & Ors.
..Respondents
AND IN THE MATTER
OF:
Assistant Teachers Association of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by its President, N.
Karthikeyan ….. Applicant.
WITH
I.A. NO. OF
2012
AN APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT
AND
I.A.NO. OF
2012
AN APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX, PLEASE SEE
INSIDE)
ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT : SURESHAN
P.
INDEX
Sl.No. Particulars Pages
1. I.A. Nos. of 2012
Application for Impleadment with affidavit
2. I.A. Nos. of 2012
Application for Modification of Interim order
Dated 20.10.2008 passed by this Hon’ble Court in
S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008 (Civil Appeal
Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 )
3. ANNEXURE –A/1
A true
copy of order dated 20.10.2008 passed by
this
Hon’ble Court
in S.L.P. Nos. 18227-18228 of
2008
(Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 )
4. ANNEXURE-A/2
A true copy of the order dated 9.2.2011 passed by
this Hon’ble
Court in
I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil
Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE
JURISDICTION
I.A. Nos. of 2012 in
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
6186-6187 OF 2008
ARISING OUT OF
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION
(CIVIL) NOS. 18227-18228 OF 2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
State of Tamil
Nadu & Anr. .Appellants
Versus
Unemployed Sec. Grade. Tech. Welf.
Assn. & Ors.
..Respondents
AND IN THE MATTER
OF:
Assistant Teachers Association of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by its President, N.
Karthikeyan .. Applicant.
APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADING OF THE APPLICANT AS PARTY
RESPONDENT
To
THE
HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES
OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
THE HUMBLE APPLICATION OF THE APPLICANT ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH
:
1. That the
present application is filed
seeking impleadment of the applicant
association as
party respondent in the pending Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 arising out
of special Leave petition being S.L.P.(C) Nos. 18227-18228 of 2008 arising out of the final judgment dated 14.05.2008 passed by the Madurai bench of the
High Court of Madras in W.A. (MD) Nos. 119 and 122 of 2008.
2. That the Applicant
Association namely Assistant Teachers
Association of Tamilnadu is a registered
Association bearing registration No. 37 of 2010. It is submitted
that most of the members of the Applicant
Association are Secondary Grade Assistant
Teachers, who were appointed in the year 2009, that is subsequent to the interim order passed
by this Hon’ble Court in the above mentioned Civil Appeals.
3. It is
submitted that previously the Teachers in the Panchayat Union School were under
the governance of the concerned
Panchayat Union under Rural Development and Local Administration Department. Subsequently the Government of Tamilnadu in
and by G.O. Ms. No. 1279 Education dated 29.6.1981 have declared that all the
teachers working in the Panchayat Union
Schools will become Government servant with effect from 1.6.1989 and they will
be eligible to all the benefits available to the Government Servants. Hence by virtue of the said Government order,
the teachers who are working in the Panchayat Union schools have become
Government servants and that they are all entitled to all the benefits and privileges
available to the Government servants.
4. It is
submitted that the Government of
Tamilnadu by G.O. Ms. No. 447 dated 16.7.1996 and by the subsequent order in
G.O. Ms. No. 241, School Education Department dated 22.9.2007 prescribe the District
– wise recruitment of Secondary Grade teachers in the Government/Panchayat
Union/Municipal Schools in the state. It is submitted that by the virtue of the above said order, the selection will
be made from among the candidates whose
names had been registered in the Employment Exchange of the respective
Districts. It is submitted that the said method of
appointment was challenged by a batch of writ petitions before the Hon’ble High
Court in so far as it restricts the selection and appointment of Secondary
Grade teachers by District-wise seniority in the Employment Exchanges, as
ultra-vires and unconstitutional and also sought for further direction to the
Respondents therein to make recruitment on State-wide basis.
It is submitted that the learned single judge of the Hon’ble High Court
dismissed the writ petitions by the judgment dated 4.2.2008.
5.
It
is submitted that aggrieved by the judgment dated 4.2.2008 , writ appeals were preferred
and the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court (Madurai Bench), of Madras was
pleased to allow the Writ Appeals by judgment dated 14.5.2008 by observing that the instructions prescribing the
recruitment on the basis of District-wise, are violative of Articles 14, 16 and
19 (1) of the Constitution of India. The Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court
held that
“35. In view of the above
discussion, in our considered opinion, confining the question of selection to
the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange of a particular district
without considering the willingness, availability and suitability of similar
candidates who have been registered in the other district employment exchanges,
is clearly violative of fundamental rights and therefore, cannot be
countenanced. The impugned G.O. Ms. No.
447, dated 16.07.1996 is liable to be quashed.
Accordingly, a direction is issued to consider the question of selection
of eligible candidates, even though such candidates names have been registered
in other District Employment Exchanges.
For the aforesaid purpose, obviously intimation is required to be given
to all the District Employment Exchanges and public advertisement throughout
the State is required to be made so that any willing candidate even though
registered in a different district can offer his candidature.”
6. It is
submitted that the State of Tamil
Nadu preferred Special leave petitions being S.L.P. Nos.
18227-18228 of 2008 before this Hon’ble Court against the common judgment dated
14.5.2008 of the Hon’ble Division Bench (Madurai Bench), of Madras. It is submitted that on 20.10.2008 , this Hon’ble
Court
was pleased to pass the following interim order in the said cases while
granting leave.;
“ Leave granted.
In so far as the applications for impleadment, they shall be brought up along with the main matters.
Having regard to the fact that a large number of vacancies in the State have remained unfilled, the State Government sought leave to fill the posts. On the submissions made, we make the following interim order, accepting the State's proposal : "Appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teachers may be made by the State Government, by calling the list of eligible persons from all the District Employment Exchanges and by newspaper Public Advertisements throughout the State so that any willing candidate even though registered in different Districts can participate in the selection. It shall be made clear in the Public Advertisement that the selection would be based on the Employment Exchange seniority. It shall also be made clear that any person selected and appointed in a particular School within a District cannot aspire for or seek transfer to another School outside the District."
This aforesaid arrangement will apply for any recruitment to be made pending disposal of these appeals.”
A true copy
of the order dated 20.10.2008 passed by
this Hon’ble Court in S.L.P. Nos.
18227-18228 of 2008 (Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 ) is produced herewith
and marked as ANNEXURE A/1 at page
No.
7. It is
respectfully submitted that on 9.2.2011
, this Hon’ble Court
was pleased to issue notice in I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil Appeal Nos.
6186-6187 of 2008 . A true copy of the order dated 9.2.2011 passed by this Hon’ble Court in I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 in Civil Appeal Nos.
6186-6187 of 2008 is produced herewith
and marked as ANNEXURE A/2 at page
No.
8. It is respectfully submitted that the Applicant Association is aggrieved by the
above said restriction on transfer imposed in interim order dated
20.10.2008 passed by this Hon’ble Court. It
is respectfully submitted that since
most of the members of the Applicant Association are appointed
subsequent to the above mentioned
interim order , they are directly affected by the restriction imposed by this
Hon’ble Court . It is further submitted that the Applicant Association has concern and also interest in the present
litigation and its member’s rights are directly in issue in the pending Civil
Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008 . Hence the Applicant Association is filing this impleading application
as well as an application for
modification of the interim order dated 20.10.2008 passed by this Hon’ble Court.
9. It is
submitted that when the Secondary Grade Teachers were absorbed as Government
servant, all the benefits entitled for Government service is made applicable to
the Secondary Grade teachers appointed under State-wide recruitment. Hence it is respectfully submitted that there can not be any
discrimination in the matter of transfer between other Government Servants and
the Secondary Grade teachers who were appointed under State-wide recruitment.
10. It is
submitted that under Article 16 (2) of the Constitution of India, there shall
be a equality of the opportunity to all citizens in the matter of relation to
employment or appointment to any office under the State and no citizen shall on
grounds only on religion, caste, sex, decades, place of birth, residence of any
of them be and ineligible or discriminated against in respect of any employment
of office under the State. Further this Hon’ble
Court also
held in General Manson Southern Routuns
Vs. Rangachari (AIR 1962- SC-36):
“The matter relating to employment or appointment are held by the Supreme
Court to hear all maters in relation to employment both parties, subsequently
such as the initial appointment, conditions of service, pertaining to the
office to which be appointment is made example, salary, increment, promotion,
leave, gratuity, pension and age of superannuation and etc…”
11. It is the
humble submission of the applicant
association that article 16 (2) is also applicable in the matter of transfer . It
is further submitted that the Selection, appointment and transfer of the post
in the Government service in the state of Tamil Nadu can not be
restricted to District wise or on the basis
of residential qualification and if such
restriction is imposed ,the same is unconstitutional and unsustainable in law .
12. It is
further submitted that the restriction
imposed in the present case is
discriminatory in nature and the same is violative of article 14 of the
Constitution of India as there is no
restriction for other Government teachers
who were already appointed as Secondary Grade teachers in the
Government/Panchayat Union/Municipal Schools and also other teachers who are
appointed in the Government Schools.
13. It is
submitted that due to the restrictions that
the appointed teachers in a particular School within a District can not aspire
or seek transferto another School outside the District, the appointed teachers
are not able to get transfer as per the
government service rule even if there are vacancies in other Districts.
14. It is further
submitted that the persons who are
appointed subsequently are able to get their appointment in their District
because of vacancies, whereas the
teachers already appointed as per the direction of the supreme court were not able to get transfer to their places
though there are vacancies.
15. It is
submitted that the restriction imposed in the interim order dated 20.10.2008 directing not to seek transfer, the teachers
who were already appointed particularly widows, wife of ex-servicemen and
husband-wife are badly affected and they
are made to stay away from the family
and living apart from their family .
16. It is
respectfully submitted that further no other departments in Government of
Tamilnadu have such conditional appointments except the appointments in issue
in the present case . It is submitted that because of restriction imposed in
interim order, those appointed under state-wide category are made to serve in
the restricted place without any
transfer to other district indefinitely.
17. It is
submitted that in view of the restriction imposed in the interim order, the
teacher who were appointed under State-wide category, mostly above 30 years of age, particularly women teachers are made to stay
away from their family but in some unsafe remote Village, without any transfer
for indefinite period only because they are appointed by virtue of the interim
order with restriction.
18. It is
respectfully submitted that the equality of opportunities to eligible person in
the matter of appointment guaranteed under the Constitution of India is denied by
the restriction imposed in the present case .
19. It is submitted
that the classification in the present recruitment on
the basis of region / residence in the present case is illegal , irrational and arbitrary and also discriminative and the same runs counter to our
Constitutional ethos on unity and integrity and equality of the nation.
20. It is
respectfully submitted that under Article 16 of the
Indian Constitution , all citizens in
the matter of public service shall be treated alike under the like circumstances and
conditions. The primary aim of the said
article is to prevent any person or
class of persons being singled out as
special subject or suffer any discrimination or hostile treatment.
21. It is
submitted that by virtue of the above
said restriction in the interim order passed by this Hon’ble Court most of the
members of the applicant Association
who are appointed after the said order under State-wide recruitment are not able to get transfer though they have
served in the District where they have appointed for 3 years in the said District.
22. Hence
it is respectfully submitted that it is
just and necessary to implead the applicant Association in the above mentioned civil
appeals as respondent and the same would enable the applicant association to put forth their submissions and grievances
before this Hon’ble Court . It is
respectfully submitted that if the applicant Association is not impleaded as the respondent in the above mentioned
appeals, they will be put to much
hardship and suffer irreparable loss and injury .
PRAYER
In the facts and circumstances above, the Applicant prays
that this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to :
(a) implead
the applicant association as a party in the
pending Civil Appeal Nos. 6186-6187 of 2008; and /or
(b) pass
such other and further order as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE APPLICANT SHALL AS IN DUTY BOUND EVER
PRAY
DRAWN BY FILED BY
MALAVIKA G (SURESHAN
P. )
ADVOCATE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT
Dated :
New Delhi
நமது வழக்கை விசாரணைக்கு ஏற்று நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய ஆணை
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Weekly Cause List
( For
27-08-2013 to 29-08-2013 )
COURT NO. 11
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
----------------------------------
PART-HEARD
1. C.A.No.6888/2008 U.O.I. & ORS. MR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD
XIV PH Vs.S.C.KARMAKAR & ORS. MR. DEBASIS MISRA
116,123, 0 S.( 610) MR. YASH PAL DHINGRA
NOT TO BE LISTED BEFORE : 132, 0, 0
GROUP MATTERS
-------------
2. C.A.No.6186-6187/2008 STATE OF T.NADU & ANR. MR. M. YOGESH KANNA
XII SD Vs.UNEMPLOYED SEC.GRADE TECH. MR. SUMIT KUMAR
WELF.ASSN.&ORS
116. S.( 615) (With Appl.(s) for directions MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN
and impleadment and MS. N. SHOBA
impleadment and impleadment MR. L.K. PANDEY
and impleadment and MR. SURESHAN P.
impleadment and impleadment MS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI
and with office report) MR. VIJAY KUMAR
MR. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD
MR. V.N. RAGHUPATHY
MR. ABHAY KUMAR
MR. RAKESH K. SHARMA
WITH
C.A.No.6184-6185/2008 SECONDARY GRADE TRAIND.TECH. MS. M. SARADA
XII WELF.ASSN. Vs. UNEMP.SEC. MR. SUMIT KUMAR
GRADE TECH.WELF.ASN.STY.& ORS.
116. S.( 615) (With Office Report) MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN
C.A.No.6188-6189/2008 T.NADU SEC.GRADE TRAINED MS. PROMILA
XII TEACH.WEL.ASSO. Vs. UNEMP.SEC. MR. SUMIT KUMAR
GRADE TEACHERS WEL.ASO.SO.&ORS
116. S.( 615) (With Office Report) MRS.REVATHY RAGHAVAN
SLP(C)No.20606/2010 R. JAYA MANI MR. VIKAS MEHTA
XII Vs.DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDN. MR. M. YOGESH KANNA
COLL.RD&ORS.
116. S.( 615) (With Prayer for Interim
Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C)No.20755/2010 M.SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE KUMAR MR. VIKAS MEHTA
XII Vs.DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY MR. M. YOGESH KANNA
EDUCATION & ORS.
116. S.( 615) (With Prayer for Interim
Relief and Office Report)
SPECIALLY DIRECTED/ADJOURNED MATTERS
------------------------------------
3. C.A.No.331/2007 GANESHLAL MR. S. RAJAPPA
XVII ADJD Vs.SHYAM
116. S.(3802)
4. C.A.No.1762/2007 J.H. PATEL (D) BY LRS. AND MR. R.D. UPADHYAY
XV ADJD ORS. MR. C.D. SINGH
Vs.NUBOARD MFG. CO LTD. & ORS.
116. S.( 101) (With Appl.(s) for permission MR. V.N. RAGHUPATHY
to file additional documents
and with office report)
[ WL.NO.25/2013
2009 இடை நிலை ஆசிசியர் மாறுதல் வழக்கு
அன்று முடிவுக்கு வந்தது . 5-9-13 ல் வழங்கப்பட்ட இறுதி தீர்ப்பு ம் அதில் நமது வழக்கறிஞர்கள் கலந்து கொண்டதற்கு ஆதாரமாக பெயர் இடம் பெற்றுள்ள விபரமும் .சிலரின் போலி முகத்திரையை இனம் கண்டுக்கொள்ள மீண்டும் நாம் இதை வெளியிடுகிறோம்
ITEM
NO.102 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T
O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).
6186-6187 OF 2008
STATE OF
T.NADU & ANR. Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UNEMPLOYED
SEC.GRADE TECH.WELF.ASSN.&ORS Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions,impleadment and office report)
WITH
Civil Appeal NO. 6184-6185 of 2008
(With office report)
Civil Appeal NO. 6188-6189 of 2008
(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20606 of 2010
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 20755 of 2010
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date: 05/09/2013 These
Appeals/SLPs were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv.
Mr.
M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.
Mr. A. Santha Kumaran,Adv.
Mr.
S. Thananjayan,Adv.
Ms.
M. Sarada,Adv.
Ms.
Promila,Adv.
Ms.
Indu Malhotra,Sr.Adv.
Mr.
Vivek Jain,Adv.
Ms.
Namrata Sood,Adv.
Ms.
Nishtha Kumar,Adv.
Mr.
Vikas Mehta,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr.
Sumit Kumar,Adv.
Mr.
Danish Zuber,Adv.
Mr.
Amit Sharma,Adv.
Ms.
Supriya,Adv.
Ms.
Chandan Ramamurthi ,Adv
- 2 -
Mr.
G. Sivabalamurugan,Adv.
Mr. Anis Mohammad,Adv.
Mr.
L.K. Pandey,Adv.
Mrs.Revathy Raghavan ,Adv.
Mr.
G. Umapathy,Adv.
Mr.
S.Ram Subramanian,Adv.
Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma ,Adv
Mr.
Subramonium Prasad ,Adv
Mr.
V.N. Raghupathy ,Adv
Ms.
V. Mohana,Adv.
Mr.
B. Raghunath,Adv.
Mr.
Vijay Kumar ,Adv
Mr.
Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.
Ms.
N. Shoba,Adv.
Mr.
Sri Ram J. Thalapathy,Adv.
Mr.
V. Adhimoolam,Adv.
Mr. A. Prasanna Venkat,Adv.
Mr.
Abhay Kumar ,Adv
Mr.
Jayanth Muth Raj,ADv.
Mrs. Malavika J,Adv.
Mr. Sureshan P.,Adv.(டாட்டா வழக்கறிஞர்கள் )
Mr.
M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.
UPON hearing
counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).
6186-6187 OF 2008
Civil
Appeals are disposed of, in
terms of the
signed
order.
CIVIL APPEAL
Nos.6184-6185/2008 & C.A.Nos.6188-6189/2008
Civil Appeals are
disposed of as having become infructuous,
in view of the
disposal of Civil Appeal Nos.6186-6187/2008.
SLP(C)NOS.20606/2010
& 20755/2010
List the
SLPs on Tuesday, the 10th September, 2013.
(O.P. Sharma) (Sneh Lata Sharma)
Court Master Court Master
(Signed
order is placed on the file)
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
STATE OF
T.NADU & ANR.
Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UNEMPLOYED
SEC.GRADE TECH.WELF.ASSN.&ORS
Respondent(s)
WITH
Civil
Appeal NO. 6184-6185 of 2008
AND
Civil
Appeal NO. 6188-6189 of 2008
O R D E R
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6186-6187 OF 2008
Heard Mr.
R. Venkataramani, learned
senior counsel
appearing in support
of the appellants and Mr. Sumit Kumar,
learned
counsel appearing for
respondent No.1. We record the statement
of Mr.
Venkataramani to the
following effect namely:
'That the
teachers who were appointed prior to
the G.O. Dated 15.11.2011 will
remain protected and as far as the transfers sought by the
teachers outside their Districts are concerned, it is for them
to apply to
the authority concerned
and the authority concerned
will consider their
applications in accordance with
their rules.'
The respondents
are satisfied with
the statement of
Mr.Venkataramani, learned
senior counsel for the appellants.
- 2 -
In view of
the above, the Civil Appeal Nos.6186-6187/2008
stand disposed of.
I.A.Nos.14-15/2012 in
C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
Ms. V.
Mohana, learned counsel alongwith Mr.
Vijay Kumar,
Advocate appearing
for the
applicants in I.A.Nos.14-15/2012 seeks
leave to withdraw the same with liberty to pursue
appropriate remedy.
I.A.Nos.14-15/2012 are accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn
with the aforesaid
liberty.
I.A.Nos.16-17/2012 in
C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
Heard Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior
counsel appearing on
behalf of the
Applicant with Ms. N. Shobha, Advocate.
I.A.Nos.16-17/2012 stand disposed of, in terms of the order
passed in C.A.
No.6186-6187/2008, in view of the statement of
Mr. R.
Venkataramani, learned
senior counsel for the appellants.
I.A.Nos.6-7/2012 in
C.A. No.6186-6187/2008
Heard Mr.
G. Umapathy, learned counsel alongwith Mr. Rakesh
Kumar Sharma, learned
counsel appearing for the Applicant.
I.A.Nos.6-7/2012 stand disposed of, in terms of the
order
passed in C.A.
No.6186-6187/2008, in view of the statement of
Mr. R.
Venkataramani, learned
senior counsel for
the appellants.
- 3 -
In view of
the disposal of
the Civil Appeal
Nos.6186-
6187/2008, all pending
IAs stand disposed of.
CIVIL APPEAL
Nos.6184-6185/2008 & C.A.Nos.6188-6189/2008
Mr. S.
Thananjayan, learned counsel
appearing for
appellants in these
appeals stated that in view of the
disposal of
Civil Appeal
Nos.6186-6187/2008, these appeals
have become
infructuous.
Civil Appeal
Nos.6184-6185/2008 & 6188-6189/2008 stand
disposed of as having
become infructuous.
......................J.
[
H.L. GOKHALE
NEW DELHI
......................J.
DATED; SEPTEMBR 5,
2013 [ J. CHELAMESWAR ]
No comments:
Post a Comment